
Cute kids in costumes
Second best thing about Halloween:

DAD CANDY! w00t! That's my haul for the night. Next year, when you're giving out candy, remember the dads.
This blog, a crossroads. My words, a sword. You, a chance wayfarer.


Like a lot of people with Asperger's syndrome, I was a picky eater as a child. Actually, that's an understatement. I basically lived on meat, potatoes (mashed or French fries), white bread, and milk until I was in my 20s.I'm also troubled by, not what Senator McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, "Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim." Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he's a Christian. He's always been a Christian. But the really right answer is, what if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer's no, that's not America. Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president?
...
I feel strongly about this particular point because of a picture I saw in a magazine. It was a photo essay about troops who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. And one picture at the tail end of this photo essay was of a mother in Arlington Cemetery, and she had her head on the headstone of her son's grave. And as the picture focused in, you could see the writing on the headstone. And it gave his awards -- Purple Heart, Bronze Star -- showed that he died in Iraq, gave his date of birth, date of death. He was 20 years old. And then, at the very top of the headstone, it didn't have a Christian cross, it didn't have the Star of David, it had crescent and a star of the Islamic faith. And his name was Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan, and he was an American. He was born in New Jersey. He was 14 years old at the time of 9/11, and he waited until he can go serve his country, and he gave his life.


But after 9/11, and especially after the war began in Iraq, Krugman judged that his comparative advantage had shifted from being an economist to being a political commentator. He was willing to see things differently because he was not an insider infected by groupthink or the "contagion of mutual imitation" (as the Indian poet Rabindranath Tagore put it). The typical insider ("the commentariat") needs "sources" to get information, becomes compromised, and hence is less prone to ruffling feathers. Krugman, by contrast, had the comparative advantage of distance from Washington, D.C., and a full-time job that gave him the independence to be "unrestrained by deference," he explains. He could also do the "budget arithmetic" on his own. So, to him, the normal journalistic ethic of balance and moderation, which he disparagingly dubs "he-said-she-said journalism," was less a virtue than an intellectual shortcoming—an unwillingness or inability to process information independently and come to considered conclusions.
Who won?
McCain (R) 27
Obama (D) 39
Draw 35
Will Obama will make the right decisions on the economy?
Before debate: 54
After debate: 68
Will McCain will make the right decisions on the economy?
Before debate: 41
After debate: 49
Who did the best job in the debate?
McCain (R) 30
Obama (D) 54
Opinion of Barack Obama (before debate)
Favorable: 64 (60)
Unfavorable: 34 (38)
Opinion of John McCain (before debate)
Favorable: 51 (51)
Unfavorable: 46 (46)
Is Palin qualified to serve as president?
Yes
Before debate: 42
After debate: 46
No
Before debate: 54
After debate: 53
1) repeat back some of the words in the question to establish that they're "answering" it;
2) parry by steering the frame of their answers toward a talking point that bears some relation to the subect of the question;
3) spray some transitional buzzwords that help them segue from what they were asked to what they have prepared to say, and;
4) deliver the focus group-tested answer they originally planned, even if it's kind of a non-sequitur.
Well, let's see. [1]There's, of course in the great history of America there have been rulings, [2]that's never going to be absolute consensus by every American. [3]And there are those issues, again, like Roe v. Wade, [4]where I believe are best held on a state level and addressed there.* So you know, going through the history of America, there would be others but --
[1]Well, I could think of … any again, [4]that could be best dealt with on a more local level. [2]Maybe I would take issue with. [3]But, you know, as a mayor, and then as a governor and even as a vice president, if I'm so privileged to serve, [4]wouldn't be in a position of changing those things but in supporting the law of the land as it reads today.**
Couric: What other Supreme Court decisions do you disagree with?
Palin: Well, let's see. There's, of course in the great history of America there have been rulings, that's never going to be absolute consensus by every American. And there are those issues, again, like Roe v. Wade, where I believe are best held on a state level and addressed there. So you know, going through the history of America, there would be others but …
Couric: Can you think of any?
Palin: Well, I could think of … any again, that could be best dealt with on a more local level. Maybe I would take issue with. But, you know, as a mayor, and then as a governor and even as a vice president, if I'm so privileged to serve, wouldn't be in a position of changing those things but in supporting the law of the land as it reads today.
